機(jī)器人這樣牛？哈佛大學(xué)的機(jī)器蜜蜂還能潛水

By Evan Ackerman30 Sep 2015 15:40 GMTHarvard's Robot Bee Is Now Also a Submarine

Image: Wyss Institute/Harvard University Gone swimmin'.

For the last several years, Harvard has been developing a robot bee. They’ve done some impressive work: their sub-paper-clip-sized, 100-milligram flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle is fully controllable down to a stable autonomous hover. It’s still tethered for power, and there’s no onboard autonomous control, but the robot flaps its wings and flies like an insect, which is awesome.

Tiny robotic bugs have lots of potential for search and rescue, surveillance, and exploration, but what’s been all the rage recently is adaptive multi-modal robotics: robots that can creatively handle a combination of terrains, making them much more versatile. With some exceptions, robots are usually pretty bad at this, and with some exceptions, humans and animals are too. There are ground robots that can handle water, and a few flying robots that aren’t totally helpless on the ground, but so far, we haven’t seen much in the way of flying robots that are good swimmers.

Yesterday at IROS, Harvard researchers presented a paper describing how they managed to get their robotic bee to swim, which I’m pretty sure is not a thing that even real bees are known for doing. With no hardware modifications at all, Harvard’s RoboBee can fly through the air, crash land in the water, and turn into a little submarine. You know what that means: nowhere is safe from robot bees.

Photo:Wyss Institute/Harvard UniversityHarvard’s RoboBee.

Things to keep in mind about these videos: RoboBee is small enough to sit on the tip of your finger, and light enough that you’d barely feel it if it was. When it flies (or swims), it’s doing so under full control: a motion capture system tracks its position, and sends trajectory commands to the robot. This works in both air and water, and RoboBee’s method of entry (a pitch over, dive, crash, and sink) is deliberate. Also, the hovering at the beginning of the first video belowlooks a little bit wonky, but that’s because RoboBee still has some water on its wings from previous tests (a more stable hover is shown in that same video, after the diving sequence, and the second video belowhas more detailsabout the experiments).

The key realization here is that swimming is actually a lot like flying: in both cases, you’re trying to propel yourself through a fluid by moving a wing (or fin) back and forth. To fly (and particularly to hover) you need to do this very quickly, but to swim, it’s a much more relaxed motion. It’s fundamentally the samemotion, though, and you can achieve it with the same basic hardware. In the case of RoboBee, to fly in air it flaps its wings at 120 Hz, while to swim in water it flaps its wings at just 9 Hz. Otherwise, three axis torque control is very similar, meaning that the robot can be steered around in the water, too.

One unique problem that RoboBee has with the water entry is that it’s so small that the surface tension of the water is enough to keep it from submerging. This is part of the reason that it has to crash land in water[right] (it alsoneeds to have its wings treated with a surfactant to help it sink). A fully loaded RoboBee (with a battery on board) might be heavy enough to avoid this problem, but at this point, it’s still an issue. Also still an issue is the whole water-air transition, which seems like it’s significantly more difficult than going from air to water, but we’ve been assured that the researchers will be tackling this in future work.

“Hybrid Aerial and Aquatic Locomotion in an At-Scale Robotic Insect,” by Yufeng Chen, E. Farrell Helbling, Nick Gravish, Kevin Ma, and Robert J. Wood from the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University was presented this week at IROS 2015 in Hamburg, Germany.

翻譯僅供參考

哈佛大學(xué)的機(jī)器蜜蜂現(xiàn)在還能潛水 harvard機(jī)器人蜜蜂現(xiàn)在也是一個(gè)submarine

圖像：威斯研究所/哈佛大學(xué)去游泳和# 39；。在過(guò)去的幾年里，哈佛一直在開(kāi)發(fā)一個(gè)機(jī)器人蜜蜂。他們都做了一些令人印象深刻的工作；其子回形針大小，100毫克的撲翼微型飛行器是完全可控的下降到一個(gè)穩(wěn)定的自主懸停。我仍然拴權(quán)力；有&rsquo；沒(méi)有星上自主控制，但機(jī)器人拍打著翅膀像昆蟲，這是真棒。

微型機(jī)器人的錯(cuò)誤有很多潛在的搜索和救援，監(jiān)控，和探索，但與rsquo；的風(fēng)靡最近的自適應(yīng)多模態(tài)機(jī)器人：機(jī)器人能創(chuàng)造性地處理相結(jié)合的地形，使它們更加靈活。在一些例外情況下，機(jī)器人通常是很不好的，并且有一些例外，人類和動(dòng)物都是如此。有地面機(jī)器人可以處理水，和一些飛行機(jī)器人是&rsquo；不完全無(wú)助于地面，但到目前為止，我們還沒(méi)有看到太多的&ldquo；飛行機(jī)器人是好的游泳方式。；< / P >

昨天在IROS，哈佛研究人員發(fā)表了一篇論文，描述他們?nèi)绾卧O(shè)法得到他們的機(jī)器人蜜蜂游泳，我在其中；肯定不是一件真正的蜜蜂被稱為做。沒(méi)有在所有的硬件修改，哈佛&rsquo；的robobee可以在空中飛行，在水上迫降，而變成了一個(gè)小潛艇。你知道這意味著什么：沒(méi)有安全從機(jī)器人蜜蜂。

photo：；Wyss研究所/哈佛universityharvard &rsquo；的robobee。<記住這些視頻P的事情：robobee是足夠小，坐在你的指尖，光照充足，你我?guī)缀醺杏X(jué)不到它；如果它是D。當(dāng)它飛行（或游泳），真的這樣做；完全的控制之下：運(yùn)動(dòng)捕捉系統(tǒng)跟蹤其位置，并發(fā)送指令到機(jī)器人軌跡。這部作品在空氣和水，和robobee &rsquo；入門的方法（一個(gè)音調(diào)，跳水，崩盤，沉）是故意的。同時(shí)，徘徊在下面?第一視頻的開(kāi)始；看起來(lái)有點(diǎn)不靠譜，但那是因?yàn)閞obobee；還有一些水在它的翅膀從以前的測(cè)試（一個(gè)更穩(wěn)定的懸停顯示在相同的視頻，在潛水的序列，和下面的第二個(gè)視頻?；有更多的細(xì)節(jié)?；關(guān)于實(shí)驗(yàn)）。

實(shí)現(xiàn)的關(guān)鍵是，游泳其實(shí)是很多像飛一樣：在這兩種情況下，你正在試圖推動(dòng)自己；通過(guò)流體的運(yùn)動(dòng)機(jī)翼（或尾翼）來(lái)回。飛（特別是懸停）你需要很快地做到這一點(diǎn)，但游泳，這是一個(gè)更寬松的運(yùn)動(dòng)。這是從根本上相同；；運(yùn)動(dòng)，雖然，你可以用相同的基本硬件實(shí)現(xiàn)。在robobee案例，飛在空氣中扇動(dòng)的翅膀在120赫茲，而在水中游動(dòng)，它扇動(dòng)的翅膀在9赫茲。否則，三軸轉(zhuǎn)矩控制是非常相似的，這意味著機(jī)器人可以把周圍的水，太。

一個(gè)獨(dú)特的問(wèn)題，robobee與入水是&rsquo；太小，水的表面張力，足以讓它淹沒(méi)。這是一部分的原因，它已經(jīng)崩潰的土地，水，[權(quán)利]（它也和需要有它的翅膀處理與表面活性劑，以幫助它下沉）。一輛滿載robobee（船上有一個(gè)電池）可能足以避免這個(gè)問(wèn)題，但在這一點(diǎn)上，這仍然是一個(gè)問(wèn)題。還一個(gè)問(wèn)題是整個(gè)氣水過(guò)渡，這似乎&rsquo；的比從空氣水更困難，但是我們一直放心；研究人員將解決這個(gè)在以后的工作中。